S. African Lightning crash Update Aug '12

All military (past & present) aircraft talk, photos, videos etc

Re: S. African Lightning crash Update Aug '12

Postby Ducati Boy » Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:07 pm

Xplumberlives wrote:
Bubbles wrote:
Xplumberlives wrote:Exactly my point DB, I think the Hunter will be the level that will always be allowed, possibly Hawks, but not Jaguars, Buccaneers or Phantoms.



The Buccaneer already is allowed, they've just not had a contract to use her.



Indeed, she is allowed to fly and HHA have waited for work to come in for that airframe and so far nothing has, so I see it as most unlikely that she will ever display due to the cost involved!

Hard to see why display flying a Buc should cost more than a Vulcan, given less ground and aircrew requirements and running costs? However, If they are expecting more of a fee for display work, perhaps they are overestimating its crowd pulling value. Maybe the reason is indeed waiting for military contract work.
Image TF - 51 Mustang "Crazy Horse" the ride of your life and I rode her EEEEEEHAAAAAAAAR!!
User avatar
Ducati Boy
Boeing C-17 Globemaster III
Boeing C-17 Globemaster III
 
Posts: 1040
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:46 pm
Location: Lindum Colonia
Also Known As: Biker Boy

Re: S. African Lightning crash Update Aug '12

Postby Olicat » Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:37 pm

I think if they've let the Vulcan fly then they are likely to let a Bucc fly too. Because with the Vulcan it is a much bigger, much more powerful, more complex, more expensive and much larger aircraft than the Buccaneer. You have the guys at Brunty who work on the Buccs and do fast taxis and plus the HHA one already has clearance to fly and does anti-det runs. Think of the other classic jets too, Sea Vixen, Hunter, Gnat e.t.c. they all have clearance to fly and I bet some are as complex as the Bucc. One problem I see though is the fact that VTTS have made the Vulcan to be the aircraft that everyone knows about and the aircraft people go mad for as far as donating goes. This makes me wonder whether anyone will care if the need for donations arises to another less popular aircraft.
Fly fast jets and/or C130s over my house please, I'm bored!

BUCCANEER TO THE SKY!
User avatar
Olicat
Lockheed Constellation
Lockheed Constellation
 
Posts: 4462
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 5:59 pm
Location: That way! ↓
Also Known As: Bullet

Re: S. African Lightning crash Update Aug '12

Postby Bubbles » Tue Sep 04, 2012 12:56 pm

The SeaVixan I'm told, costs the same if not more to book as the Vulcan for a display but unlike the Vulcan relies entirely on display fees to pay its way. A Buccaneer would be in a similar situation and if organisers are going to splurge many thousands on one aircraft then it's going to be a crowd puller which is going to be the flying triangle. If in the unlikely event of HHA putting the Brick on the circuit then it'll be when 558 is grounded for good.
Image



Yes, yes you did!
User avatar
Bubbles
Boeing B-29 Superfortress
Boeing B-29 Superfortress
 
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2008 6:01 pm
Location: Lost And Confused.

Re: S. African Lightning crash Update Aug '12

Postby Mayfly » Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:28 pm

I was told that as the HHA is a business every asset must pay it's way - display work would not cover the costs.
In memory of a very dear friend - Mike Pearson

Very fond memories of Robbie Gilvary - DTs 1st Vulcan Captain who taught DT all he knew.
User avatar
Mayfly
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 29760
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 7:11 pm
Location: Bomber County

Re: S. African Lightning crash Update Aug '12

Postby Ducati Boy » Tue Sep 04, 2012 10:06 pm

Olicat wrote:I think if they've let the Vulcan fly then they are likely to let a Bucc fly too. Because with the Vulcan it is a much bigger, much more powerful, more complex, more expensive and much larger aircraft than the Buccaneer. You have the guys at Brunty who work on the Buccs and do fast taxis and plus the HHA one already has clearance to fly and does anti-det runs. Think of the other classic jets too, Sea Vixen, Hunter, Gnat e.t.c. they all have clearance to fly and I bet some are as complex as the Bucc. One problem I see though is the fact that VTTS have made the Vulcan to be the aircraft that everyone knows about and the aircraft people go mad for as far as donating goes. This makes me wonder whether anyone will care if the need for donations arises to another less popular aircraft.


Olicat,
Suggest you take a look at the CAA web site and see what the term "complex" actually means, it doesn't mean complicated. Most classic jets stuff that flys on permit is not complex and is not complicated either. :)
Your probably right that the "Vulcan effect" means she may be able to keep flying till we can no longer keep her flyable and that may overshadow other attempts to get complex types to flight, but thats the way the cookie crumbles in the airshow game. Its a shame the Bucc seems unable to get trade and please folk at airshows again.
Image TF - 51 Mustang "Crazy Horse" the ride of your life and I rode her EEEEEEHAAAAAAAAR!!
User avatar
Ducati Boy
Boeing C-17 Globemaster III
Boeing C-17 Globemaster III
 
Posts: 1040
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:46 pm
Location: Lindum Colonia
Also Known As: Biker Boy

Re: S. African Lightning crash Update Aug '12

Postby Hazzer111 » Tue Sep 04, 2012 10:24 pm

The hha Aircraft status show that the buccaneer Is being overhauled?!
http://www.hunterteam.com/hha_aircraft_fleet.htm
User avatar
Hazzer111
AgustaWestland Merlin
AgustaWestland Merlin
 
Posts: 165
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 4:22 pm
Location: Bomber county

Re: S. African Lightning crash Update Aug '12

Postby Olicat » Tue Sep 04, 2012 10:28 pm

When I said complex (when talking about the Vulcan), I was referring to maintenance - I imagine a huge 4 engined aircraft is way more expensive than a small (in comparison) twin engined aircraft.

And yep, until the Vulcan stops flying I doubt the public would care for another aircraft (and even then it wouldn't be a Bucc)

I guess I'll wait and see!
Fly fast jets and/or C130s over my house please, I'm bored!

BUCCANEER TO THE SKY!
User avatar
Olicat
Lockheed Constellation
Lockheed Constellation
 
Posts: 4462
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 5:59 pm
Location: That way! ↓
Also Known As: Bullet

Re: S. African Lightning crash Update Aug '12

Postby Bubbles » Wed Sep 05, 2012 2:13 pm

Why wouldn't they care for the mighty Buccaneer ?
Image



Yes, yes you did!
User avatar
Bubbles
Boeing B-29 Superfortress
Boeing B-29 Superfortress
 
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2008 6:01 pm
Location: Lost And Confused.

Re: S. African Lightning crash Update Aug '12

Postby Ray C » Wed Sep 05, 2012 4:07 pm

Any "Cold War" aircraft flying is to be applauded.
Anyway I thought this was a Lightning thread.......! :p
Be yourself...everyone else is taken...!
Oscar Wilde.
User avatar
Ray C
BAE Hawk
BAE Hawk
 
Posts: 2602
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 3:31 pm
Location: Almost in sight of the Vulcan birthplace
Also Known As: Castle boy

Re: S. African Lightning crash Update Aug '12

Postby Olicat » Wed Sep 05, 2012 5:38 pm

Bubbles wrote:Why wouldn't they care for the mighty Buccaneer ?


Because it's not a Vulcan. ;) Im not saying that as my thoughts (personally I think pretty much the opposite!)

How many people other than the Aviation community care for other classic jets? Sea Vixen being an example. To them there would be nothing special about it.

Going back to Lightnings, I think the public's view towards an airworthy Lightning would be different and/or similar to the Vulcan effect... however, it will never happen in the UK.
Fly fast jets and/or C130s over my house please, I'm bored!

BUCCANEER TO THE SKY!
User avatar
Olicat
Lockheed Constellation
Lockheed Constellation
 
Posts: 4462
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 5:59 pm
Location: That way! ↓
Also Known As: Bullet

Previous

Return to Military Aircraft

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests