Hi,
I am sat here trying my hardest to not feel anxious about the general situation at hand; that yes we have a nice big lump sum but we've had that before and we still ended up in a mess. In doing so, I'm inevitably thinking "well they should have done that, they should have sorted x, y and z..." but I'm no business-whizz so really, what do I know?! On the other hand, as it is the people's aircraft, should we have a say in how it is run? We didn't have the chance to vote for who should run her, and if we don't have a say in how she is run - then really how is it the people's aircraft at all?
So, that led me to wonder - should the VOC and the Club be 'accountable' to the supporters? If so, to what degree and what depth?
I feel that we have been let down in recent years, and that the promises made have been broken time and time again. I would like answers for why that has happened and I am wondering if we are entitled or if it is just a case of "either support blindly, or don't support"?
I also feel that given the (in my opinion) gravity of the fact that it was promised that the begging bowl would not come out this year (to the degree it did last year) and it has, is reason enough for an official inquiry, preferably by way of a Question and Answer session.
Just as an example, I would like to know why the book we produced (Her Majestic Return) was supposed to be sold through Amazon and through the shops in the RAF museums, but still, a year later, isn't (as far as I know). There may be a good answer (I hope it is), or it might be being sorted as we speak. Please don't try to answer this question in this thread - I am just giving an example of what type of question I think we should be allowed to ask, and receive a reply to.
If small situations like this are left unquestioned, then major opportunities are being wasted and there is a very real risk of us being in the same situation in a few months time.
No one person, whether it be at TVOC, on a forum, in the club, on the committee or anywhere, can possibly remember all the things that were promised and not done, but each of us probably have specific bugbears that have wound us up over the last 2 years, that we could present during a Q&A.
The Q&A would have to be conducted by e-mail I imagine and possibly one or two people could be responsible for directing the question to the relevant head of department and then tracking it to ensure a reply has been published. All the questions and answers should then be presented in a special report (by e-mail) to go out to anyone who has expressed an interest in receiving it, and/or posted online.
If anyone is about to say "we don't have time to do that" then my answer is: "we don't have the money to NOT do it!".
Opinions?
CG









And it will be the same answer as it would have been six months ago...



